Say “Nay!” to “My Little Pony” Talking Princess Celestia Doll!
Rebecca Hains, best be known these days as the woman who got busted by the TSA for trying to take a red velvet cupcake through airport security, is, in her real life a media studies professor at Salem State University and author of Growing Up With Girl Power; Girlhood on Screen and in Every Day Life. She is also mother to a little boy who loves “My Little Pony,” a show, Rebecca says on her blog, that, like the beloved Powerpuff Girls, appeals equally to both sexes, defying the notion that boys/men won’t watch stories about girls/women.
I have to admit I’m not a “My Little Pony” aficianado—my daughter was never into them and I recalled the old show as being inane, and largely about selling toys (the fact that the ponies were revived for the Hub, a TV station owned by Hasbro, and are skinnier and “prettier” in their new incarnation only reinforced those impressions). Creator Lauren Faust writes on the Ms. Magazine blog that she was not initially a fan, either:
[Shows based on girls’ toys] did not reflect the way I played…I assigned my ponies and my Strawberry Shortcake dolls distinctive personalities and sent them on epic adventures to save the world. On TV, though, I couldn’t tell one girl character from another and they just had endless tea parties, giggled over nothing and defeated villains by either sharing with them or crying–which miraculously inspired the villain to turn nice.
With her new MLP, Faust claims she wanted to challenge “the perception that ‘girly’ equals lame or “for girls” equals crappy,” to show:
there are lots of different ways to be a girl. You can be sweet and shy, or bold and physical. You can be silly and friendly, or reserved and studious. You can be strong and hard working, or artistic and beautiful. This show is wonderfully free of “token girl” syndrome, so there is no pressure to shove all the ideals of what we want our daughters to be into one package. There is a diversity of personalities, ambitions, talents, strengths and even flaws in our characters–it’s not an army of cookie-cutter nice-girls or cookie-cutter beauty queens like you see in most shows for girls.
Whether you agree or not, I wonder how Faust feels how her attempt was distorted on the way to the toy shelves, turned into the very thing she once despised. Consider Talking Princess Celestia, whom you’ll notice in the link is advertised as a toy that will “encourage your child’s imagination.” On the show Celestia is a white horse who rules the ponies wisely and well. But–uh-oh!–in the toy store she’s turned pink! And what does pink usually mean? Well, Rebecca pressed Celestia’s “cutie” button (gag gag) to find out:
Let’s recap: FIVE of Celesita’s twelve comments are about appearance (“I love when you comb my hair!” “Oh, my hair looks beautiful.” “My wings are so pretty!” “My barrettes look so pretty!” “You’re beautiful”); two are about princesses; two are about friendship; two relate to activity (“Let’s fly to the castle!” “I will light the way!”) and one is the word “Spectacular!”
As Rebecca points out, that means when a child plays with this Princess Celestia toy, he or she will be bombarded with self-absorbed, pretty princess vanity, the kind, she says, the show is, happily, free of.
Why’d Hasbro do it? The same reason Nick makes the bizarrely-named Magic Hair Fairytale Princess Dora doll: they think they’ll make a buck. only we parents can prove them wrong.
Incidentally, Celestia was originally supposed to be a QUEEN, not a princess, but according to Faust:
I was told [by Hasbro] that because of Disney movies, girls assume that Queens are evil (although I only remember 1 evil queen) and Princesses are good. I was also told that the perceived youth of a Princess is preferable to consumers.
She does not have parents that outrank her. I brought the weirdness of that situation to my bosses, but it did not seem to be a continuity concern to them, so I’m letting it alone. I always wanted her to be the highest authority, and so she remains so. And I certainly don’t want marriage to be what would escalate her. (Bad messages to girls and what not.)
[...] I put up a bit of a fight when her title changed, but you win some, you loose some.
Indeed.
Rebecca suggests a few substitutions for the doll’s script. How about:
I’m a princess! I rule my country with wisdom.
I love teaching my students. Do you love school?
You’re so smart!
You remind me of Twilight Sparkle, my best student.
You’re beautiful outside and in
Together, we can do anything!
A propos of that last phrase: if you’re interested in letting Hasbro know we want our girls to think, play and be something beyond pretty, pink princess, here’s Rebecca’s petition at change.org.

Facebook
Twitter
Email Sign-Up
RSS Feed
Peggy, there are so many blog posts and newspaper articles about girl-targeted toys these days and about all of the work going into signing petitions and getting the corporations to stop what they are doing. At the same time, I am observing an uptick in how parents (mostly moms) are negatively reacting to these posts and articles. I can’t get over the comment thread on HuffPo right now about the LEGO petition. There are an overwhelming number of commenters saying some version of “this is no big deal,” “find something better to do with your time,” or “my daughter loves princesses and so did I and what’s wrong with that.” Even worse, commenters seem to be getting more aggressive with remarks like “if all you people writing about girl toys would spend your energy dealing with the REAL problems in the world like hunger, poverty and crime, then maybe something useful would get done.” I am finding mothers to be in increasing denial about this, and many of them are almost acting as if this is a threat to THEIR love of beauty, pink, princess, etc. I am amazed that with more information, the readers seem to be less and less able to process the issue, and more and more inclined to fight it…HARD. Any thoughts??
I try to laugh when people take time out of their own days to tell us that we are wasting our time writing about issues that matter to us. Because, as Amy Poehler might have once said on SNL, “Really?!”
Lori, I think it’s inevitable that when you bring up an issue and you hit a nerve there is a HARD pushback. So you just have to continue to say it and say it and say it. And find new ways of saying it.
But I find that two things happen simultaneously–people become more aware and more interested AND people become more resistant. I think you’d just find that with any attempt at change. So dont despair. Belittling, trivializing, and attacking people who are pushing for change, especially for women and girls, is, unfortunately, part of the process!
Yep, apparently. Galileo experienced this, didn’t he?!
Yeah, and consider the gravity of HIS situation (ha!)
Brilliant reply Peggy the punster, and agree with you too Lori that the beachhead of behavioral change is unveiling the macro lens problem to begin with, when many are swimming in this sea of pop culture crud so they don’t even see the tsunami of damage swirling offshore. Banzai!
And I say this as someone who has been writing about girls and women for..gosh, over twenty years! A drop in the bucket!
This pony kind of reminds me of the Simpsons episode where Lisa gets her first Malibu Stacy talking doll, only to be incredibly disappointed. I wonder how many little girls push that button and feel the same way about this pony.
Yeah, check it out!
I was dismayed when I scrolled down to the image of Princess Celestia. I loved the idea of eventually getting my daughter My Little Ponies for their “classic” and “vintage” charm, since I loved them as I child myself. I never watched the cartoon, but the endless variety of colors and the little designs on their… back… led me to create intricate stories with lots of character development! This pony looks like she went through a few too many plastic surgeries. Where is the cute snubbed face, and the rounded contours? What’s up with the ski slope face? She looks like exactly what we see in fashion magazines, but caricaturized in the form of a horse. Frightening. I shall be cruising ebay for vintage ponies when the time comes.
I totally agree, Angie. In my talks I show side-by-side photos of the old and new versions of Strawberry Shortcake, Rainbow Brite, Holly Hobby & My Little Pony. They’ve ALL had “plastic surgery” (ha!). As have Trolls, which I wrote about here.
eeek! Those are NOT trolls! They look like the Keebler Elf’s sexy evil cousin. I hope I handle my daughter’s requests for trendy toys gracefully when they eventually happen. Preparing now with lots of reading (she’s 18 months)!
Too funny!
My mom happens to still have my My Little Ponies from the eighties. Occasionally she will pull them out for my daughter and my nephews to play with. Certainly they are better than the new ones in design, but still the toy basically revolves around dressing the pony and combing its hair (mine actually have hair curlers that go with them). The toy manufacturer’s intent is pretty clear…these toys are for practicing grooming and “making pretty”. Luckily, my daughter is still at a point where this concept has not been indoctrinated, and we are trying our best to offer her other options…sometimes I feel like we’re fighting the giant though!
I think part of the pushback comes from defensiveness…if parents perceive that someone is saying the way they’ve been raising their children is “wrong” then it’s easier to reject the position than examine and possibly admit that they haven’t made the best choices for their kids. I say this as a certified car seat tech (CPST) who faces this kind of opposition and blowoff whenever I try to educate parents about rear-facing longer for safety, extended harness use (vs booster or, God forbid, seatelt only) etc–things that studies have all proven to be safer but parents don’t want to hear if they’ve already set their hearts on turning the baby around or moving up to that “big kid” seat. It’s their prerogative but I really think its knee jerk reaction to another parent’s perceived “criticism” of their choices. *shrug*
So true, Jenny. That’s why I really worked hard on the tone in CAMD, to come off as friendly, funny, curious etc–it was imperative to have a tone and style that didn’t make people feel I was criticizing them. Because I”m NOT. Just want people to think and then from there it’s up to them.
I agree with this too. I also think that for parents to look around at their daughters’ pinkified rooms, clothes and toys, it puts them in the position of feeling like they were hoodwinked by marketing. And parents are very fond of saying it’s all about the parenting, not the toys, etc. So it makes them feel they’ve made poor choices *and* that they were fooled. This makes it easier to understand the push-back.
Sexism is alive and well in toyland isn’t it? And sadly, else where as well.
Hi Peggy,
I seriously suggest you take a look at a few MLP Friendship is Magic episodes on the Hub. I think you will be pleasantly surprised. Especially the 2-part pilot, where you will get a chance to really learn what the show is about, and get a glimpse at each character’s personality. Everything Lauren Faust says about girls is reflected in the show. The shows focus on so many topics – wanting to fit in with the in crowd, appreciating your family, learning to deal with “late blooming” (the cutie mark crusaders – the only girls in school who don’t yet have their cutie marks), even cross-cultural cooperation (in an episode that’s a MLP version of the conflict between Native Americans and Western settlers…) My 4 year old daughter loves it, as does my almost-2 year old son (he’s a “brony”)
As for the Princess Celestia toy, you would never hear Princess Celestia uttering those phrases on the show. She is mostly concerned about lessons of friendship that the ponies have learned, being a good sister, and watching over all her subjects throughout Equestria. Her character shows that being the leader is hard work and requires wise decision making.
Please watch a few episodes, and let us know what you think!
Fondly,
Beth
Hi Beth,
I’m going to check it out and I totally believe you and Rebecca and Lauren Faust that it’s good stuff. AND I wish they hadn’t skinnified the ponies AND I think it’s despicable to work so hard to create that range of characters and nonetheless do a bait-and-switch in the toy store. Fans of the show should be even MORE pissed off about the Princess Celestia thing. If she’s as good a character as she appears to be, what a shame to do that to her!
I love that the show has this adult male following that has “Brony” conventions. Cracks me up.
In fact, bronies, I’d like to hear from you–what you like about MLP and what you think of the marketing of the toys.
Don’t see a lot of bronies replying here. So I guess I’ll have a say.
I’ve been a brony since July-ish. I’ve been following the series, fanbase, and seen every episode up to this point. The bronies cannot stand most of the toys and have been complaining ever since the toys being not very accurate to the show. They’ve been fighting a losing battle. So instead, they make their own toys and customs and sell make quite a lot on eBay (one Fluttershy plushie in a dress she wore in the season finale went up to $2500+ because it was very detailed and well made). The closest thing to show accuracy is blindbag toys, but even that has issues such as Fluttershy’s hair being just a clone of Rainbow Dash.
Anyway, not as a brony but as big brother of a younger sister, I agree with all this and hate how Hasbro has been treating the toys. Girls deserve better toys.
I don’t think kids will buy it, you can hear the phrases before taking the product home, and kids who watch the show want toys that are based on the show, which these obviously aren’t.
I think they’re shooting themselves on the foot when trying to sell these things, much better and even easier is to just give kids what they want, toys that look and talk like the characters.
I’m a princess! I rule my country with wisdom.
I love teaching my students. Do you love school?
You’re so smart!
You remind me of Twilight Sparkle, my best student.
You’re beautiful outside and in
Together, we can do anything!
Scratch the “you’re beautiful”, kids hear enough of that. How about just letting kids be kids and not even think about wether they’re beautiful or not? Relating your self-esteem to your appearance from an early age can only lead to shit.
http://www.mwggstore.com/collections/dolls
Please consider these types of toys, Lauren wanted to make Milky way and the galaxy girls for a long time now, but she was told that, pay attention, “girls don’t watch cartoons”.
It is very noticeable that most of the things Celestia says are appearance/beauty related. This emphasis on looks and clothes and accessories and even friendship is just not present in boy’s toys–I know because I have boys and toys are focused and oriented around action and doing things and adventure. And conflict and fighting and power.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150543482302460&set=pu.79468752459&type=1&theater
I hope this works, if not I will post it on your facebook
page.
If you remember,and I hope you did a few years ago they made a MLP Celestia that was white with sparkly blue wings,but without a horn.You do have the authority to teach a child,not a toy.Toys only teach new words,If you let a toy influence you then the child has low self esteem.TV teaches our kid more than a toy,and the TV norm teaches good lessons to kids.Sometimes it’s bad,But things like MLP,and Monster High teach great lessons,but you have to look at whats on the inside not the outside.
Also if your so worried about peeps then touch up on the subject of that song I’m sexy and I know it and wiggles,Dougy’s,and wobbles that go along with that song.Don’t touch up on a subject about pink unicorns,you need to worry about pervertish songs and dances.Peeps would’ve thought about ridding that song if they weren’t so obsessed over pink unicorns by now.I’m trying my best to make up catchy,unpervertish dance and find a good song for it,but that’s tough work.So please help my fight against the song instead of against pink unicorns.